🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective professional network test this week after viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."