🔗 Share this article

In a unsigned order, the nation's top court permitted Texas to employ a revised congressional boundary scheme that may create as many as five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three order, released on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to set aside a federal judge's injunction that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Court's Explanation

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing significant confusion and upsetting the fine equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its action.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely classified voters by their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the new maps. It had ordered the state to revert to the maps drawn after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Sharp Opposition

With a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's ruling. She stated that it undermined the work of the district court, observing that its decision was written by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan wrote in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a breach of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

This decision occurs during a countrywide contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Ordinarily, map-drawing happens after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that could add a number of additional conservative seats. The opposition, for their part, have responded with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State attorney general welcomed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures representation aligned with the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

On the other hand, Democratic leaders lamented the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major party election organization.

Another senior Democratic leader said the court had another time eroded its standing by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.