🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that those in power allow or withhold at their discretion. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the current government is advancing, which would dictate when and where demonstrations can occur, with possible imprisonment for those who defy these limitations.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Earlier governments had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement extensive additional powers, which global rights bodies had condemned as "significant and unjustified limitations" on civil liberties. Collectively, these progressive attacks on liberty have practically eliminated the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Tragedy to Justify Crackdown

The latest restrictive measures are being justified by referring to last week's terrible antisemitic attack on a Manchester Islamic center. There should be universal agreement that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, using this atrocity as a justification to suppress opposition is not only disconnected to that duty but distorts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at genocide, you probably can't draw the line at democratic principles," observed a prominent American author, a statement that applies equally for the present administration.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Consider Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their time, even while they were advocating the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's truly happening: Israel – a foreign state – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have characterized as systematic destruction. Its military actions have prompted the global justice body to issue legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

International popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public believe Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on arms sales to the nation, and approve the detention of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely failed the argument, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a despicable anti-Jewish attack to try to silence a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this attempt. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to proceed.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish identity with the actions of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where law enforcement can suggest that demonstrations opposing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "implicated" in supposed mistreatment faced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the horrific toll from two years of daily atrocities that have claimed many thousands of human lives. British politicians and media outlets have hardly hidden the limited value they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest expressions of discrimination in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a dangerous boundary by proscribing a specific activist group, a peaceful, human rights-focused direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been arrested, primarily for carrying placards against genocide and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those detained are pensioners; among them a former clergyman and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader implied that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president characterized such demonstrations as antisemitic. In doing so, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such protests – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to suppress dissent. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears struggled, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to establish our freedoms. We may ultimately rue how casually we permitted them to slip away.